Factors determining visual detection distance to real flowers by bumble bees

Authors

  • Gidi Ne'eman D Department of Biology and Environment, University of Haifa-Oranim
  • Rina Ne'eman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2017)one

Abstract

Plants use visual signals to attract pollinators and direct them to their flowers. Visual capabilities of bees have been extensively studied mostly using artificial paper models. However, there is no empirical determination of the maximal detection distance (MDD) or minimal subtended visual angle (MSVA) of real flowers. Using a six armed radial maze, we tested MDD and MSVA of 12 types of natural and manipulated real flowers by bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) workers. Bees were initially trained to obtain sugar solution at target flowers that were presented at close range on a mobile divider at the back of one of the six arms. Bees were individually marked and tested. For bees that passed the short range test, we gradually increased the distance of the target flower, until the number of successful choices reached chance level, indicating that they could not see the target flowers. The results show that MSVA of flowers is correlated with flower diameter but not with MDD. The variation in MDD to natural flowers by bumble bee workers can be best predicted by: MDD = flower coloured area / (contour line * green contrast). Contour line length determines flower dissectedness. Full circular flowers can be detected from longer distance than dissected flowers with identical diameter. We hypothesize that dissected flower shapes might be compensated by their higher attractiveness for bees. Empirical determination of real flower MDD and MSVA is important for studying bee foraging behaviour, pollinator induced evolution of flower traits and validation of neurophysiological visual models.

Author Biography

Gidi Ne'eman, D Department of Biology and Environment, University of Haifa-Oranim

Prof. at the Department of Biology and Environment, University of Haifa-Oranim

References

Anderson AM (1977) Shape perception in the honey bee. Animal Behaviour 25:67-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(77)90068-9

Armbruster WS, Antonsen L, Pélabon C (2005) Phenotypic selection on Dalechampia blossoms: honest signalling affects pollination success. Ecology 86:3323-3333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1873

Avarguès-Weber A, Deisig N, Giurfa M (2011) Visual cognition in social insects. Annual Review of Entomology 56:423-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144855

Avarguès-Weber A, Giurfa M (2014) Cognitive components of color vision in honey bees: how conditioning variables modulate color learning and discrimination. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 200:449-461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-014-0909-z

Avarguès-Weber A, d’Amaro D, Metzler M, Dyer AG (2014) Conceptualization of relative size by honeybees. Frontiers in Behavioral Neurosciences 8:80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00080

Backhaus W (1991) Color opponent coding in the visual system of the honeybee. Vision research 31:1381–1397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(91)90059-E

Blarer A, Keasar T, Shmida A (2002) Possible mechanisms for the formation of flower size preferences by foraging bumblebees. Ethology 108:341-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00778.x

Bukovac Z, Dorin A, Dyer A (2013) A-Bees See: a simulation to assess social bee visual attention during complex search tasks. In: Lio P, Miglino O, Nicosia G, Nolfi S, Pavone M (eds) Advances in artificial life, ECAL 2013. Proceedings of the twelfth European conference on the synthesis and simulation of living systems, Taormina, September 2013. Complex Adaptive Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, London, pp 276–283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/978-0-262-31709-2-ch042

Bukovac Z, Dorin A, Finke V, Shrestha M, Garcia J, Avarguès-Weber A, Burd AM, Schramme J, Dyer A (2016) Assessing the ecological significance of bee visual detection and colour discrimination on the evolution of flower colours. Evolutionary Ecology 30:1-20.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-016-9843-6

Chittka L (1992) The colour hexagon: a chromaticity diagram based on photoreceptor excitations as a generalized representation of colour opponency. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 170:533-543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00199331

Chittka L, Raine NE (2006) Recognition of flowers by pollinators. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 9:428-435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.002

Chittka L, Spaethe J (2007) Visual search and the importance of time in complex decision making by bees. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 1:37-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-007-9001-8

Conner JK, Rush S (1996) Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 105:509-516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00330014

Dafni A, Giurfa M (1999) The functional ecology of floral guides in relation to insects behaviour and vision. In: Waser S (ed) Evolutionary theory and processes: modern perspectives. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 363-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4830-6_23

Dafni A, Kevan PG (1997) Flower size and shape: implications in pollination. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 45:201-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07929978.1997.10676684

Dafni A, Lehrer M, Kevan P (1997) Spatial flower parameters and insect spatial vision. Biological Review 72:239-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0006323196005002

Dyer AG, Chittka L (2004) Biological significance of distinguishing between similar colours in spectrally variable illumination: bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) as a case study. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 190:105-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-003-0475-2

Dyer AG, Whitney HM, Arnold SE, Glover BJ, Chittka L (2007) Mutations perturbing petal cell shape and anthocyanin synthesis influence bumblebee perception of Antirrhinum majus flower colour. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 1:45-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-007-9002-7

Dyer AG, Spaethe J, Prack S (2008) Comparative psychophysics of bumblebee and honeybee colour discrimination and object detection. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 194:617-627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-008-0335-1

Dyer AG, Streinzer M, Garcia J (2016). Flower detection and acuity of the Australian native stingless bee Tetragonula carbonaria Sm. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 202:629-639.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-016-1107-y

Elle E, Carney R (2003) Reproductive assurance varies with flower size in Collinsia parviflora (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 90:888-896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.6.888

Fenster CB, Cheely G, Dudash MR, Reynolds RJ (2006) Nectar reward and advertisement in hummingbird-pollinated Silene virginica (Caryophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 93:1800-1807. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.93.12.1800

Frisch Kv (1914) Der Farbensinn und Formensinn der Biene. Gustav Fischer, Jena. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.11736

Galen C (1999) Why do flowers vary? The functional ecology of variation in flower size and form within natural plant populations. Bioscience 49:631-640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1313439

Galen C, Newport M (1987) Bumble bee behavior and selection on flower size in the sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia 74:20-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377340

Giurfa M, Vorobyev M (1997) The detection and recognition of color stimuli by honeybees: performance and mechanisms. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 45:129-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07929978.1997.10676679

Giurfa M, Vorobyev M, Kevan P, Menzel R (1996) Detection of coloured stimuli by honeybees: minimum visual angles and receptor specific contrasts. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 178:699-709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227381

Goodwillie C, Sargent RD, Eckert CG, Elle E, Geber MA, Johnston MO, Kalisz S, Moeller DA, Ree RH, Vallejo‐Marin M (2010) Correlated evolution of mating system and floral display traits in flowering plants and its implications for the distribution of mating system variation. New Phytologist. 185, 311-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03043.x

Heinrich B (1975) Energetics of pollination. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15:139-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.06.110175.001035

Hempel de Ibarra NH, Giurfa M, Vorobyev M (2001). Detection of coloured patterns by honeybees through chromatic and achromatic cues. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 187: 215-224.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590100192

Hempel de Ibarra N, Giurfa M, Vorobyev M (2002) Discrimination of coloured patterns by honeybees through chromatic and achromatic cues. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 188:503-512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-002-0322-x

Hempel de Ibarra NH, Vorobyev M, Menzel R (2014) Mechanisms, functions and ecology of colour vision in the honeybee. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 200:411-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-014-0915-1

Hempel de Ibarra NH, Langridge KV, Vorobyev M (2015) More than colour attraction: behavioural functions of flower patterns. Current Opinion in Insect Science 12:64-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2015.09.005

Herrera J (2005) Flower size variation in Rosmarinus officinalis: individuals, populations and habitats. Annals of Botany 95:431-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci041

Hertz M (1929) Die Organisation des optischen Feldes bei der Biene. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 8:693-748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00340937

IBM Corporation (2010) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0. Armonk, NY IBM Corp.

Kaczorowski RL, Seliger AR, Gaskett AC, Wigsten SK, Raguso RA (2012) Corolla shape vs. size in flower choice by a nocturnal hawkmoth pollinator. Functional Ecology 26, 577-587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.01982.x

Kapustjansky A, Chittka L, Spaethe J (2010) Bees use three-dimensional information to improve target detection. Naturwissenschaften 97:229-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-009-0627-5

Keasar T, Pollak G, Arnon R, Cohen D, Shmida A (2006) Honesty of signalling and pollinator attraction: the case of flag-like bracts. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 54:119-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1560/IJPS_54_2_119

Krizek BA, Anderson JT (2013) Control of flower size. Journal of Experimental Botany 64:1427-1437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert025

Kugler H (1934) Blütenokologische Untersuchungen mit Hummeln VII Die Anlockung von "Neulingen" durch Blüten. Planta 23:692-714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01913623

Lehrer M, Bischof S (1995) Detection of model flowers by honeybees: the role of chromatic and achromatic contrast. Naturwissenschaften 82:145-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01177278

Lehrer M, Horridge GA, Zhang SW, Gadagkar R (1995) Shape vision in bees: Innate preference for flower-like patterns. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 347:123–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1995.0017

Leonard AS, Papaj DR (2011) ‘X’ marks the spot: the possible benefits of nectar guides to bees and plants. Functional Ecology 25:1293-1301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01885.x

Lunau K, Fieselmann G, Heuschen B, van de Loo A (2006) Visual targeting of components of floral colour patterns in flower-naive bumblebees (Bombus terrestris; Apidae). Naturwissenschaften 93:325-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-006-0105-2

Martin NH (2004) Flower size preferences of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) foraging on Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Evolutionary Ecological Research 6:777-782.

Menzel R, Giurfa M (2006) Dimensions of cognition in an insect, the honeybee. Behavioural and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 5:24-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582306289522

Menzel R, Gumbert A, Kunze J, Shmida A, Vorobyev M (1997) Pollinators' strategies in finding flowers. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 45:141-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07929978.1997.10676680

Menzel R, Shmida A (1993) The ecology of flower colours and the natural colour vision of insect pollinators: the Israeli flora as a study case. Biological Review 68:81-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1993.tb00732.x

Neal PR, Dafni A, Giurfa M (1998) Floral symmetry and its role in plant-pollinator systems: terminology, distribution, and hypotheses. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:345-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.345

Ne'eman G, Kevan PG (2001) The effect of shape parameters on maximal detection distance of model target by honeybee workers. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 187:653-660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590100237

Peitsch D, Fietz A, Hertel H, de Souza J, Ventura DF, Menzel R (1992) The spectral input systems of hymenopteran insects and their receptor-based colour vision. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 170:23–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00190398

Plowright CMS, Evans SA, Leung JC, Collin CA (2011) The preference for symmetry in flower-naïve and not-so-naïve bumblebees. Learning and Motivation 42:76-83.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2010.08.009

Schaefer HM, Schaefer V, Levey DJ (2004) How plant–animal interactions signal new insights in communication. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:577-584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.08.003

Simonds V, Plowright CMS (2004) How do bumblebees first find flowers? Unlearned approach responses and habituation. Animal Behaviour 67:379-386.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.03.020

Spaethe J, Chittka L (2003) Interindividual variation of eye optics and single object resolution in bumblebees. Journal of Experimental Biology 206:3447-3453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00570

Spaethe J, Tautz J, Chittka L (2001) Visual constraints in foraging bumblebees: flower size and color affect search time and flight behavior. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences Biology 98:3898-3903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.071053098

Sprengel CK (1793/1996) Discovery of the secret of nature in the structure and fertilization of flowers (translated by Hasse P). In: Lloyd DG, Barrett SC (eds) Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Springer, New York, pp 3-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1165-2_1

Srinivasan MV (2010) Honey bees as a model for vision, perception, and cognition. Annual Review of Entomology 55:267-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.010908.164537

Streinzer M, Paulus HF, Spaethe J (2009) Floral colour signal increases short-range detectability of a sexually deceptive orchid to its bee pollinator. Journal of Experimental Biology 212:1365-1370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.027482

Thompson EL, Plowright CM (2014) How images may or may not represent flowers: picture–object correspondence in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens)? Animal Cognition 17:1031-1043.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0733-4

Vorobyev M, Gumbert A, Kunze J, Giurfa M, Menzel R (1997) Flowers through insect eyes. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 45:93-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07929978.1997.10676676

Waser NM, Price MV (1985) The effect of nectar guides on pollinator preference: experimental studies with a montane herb. Oecologia 67:121-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378462

Wertlen AM, Niggebrugge C, Vorobyev M, Hempel de Ibarra N (2008) Detection of patches of coloured discs by bees. Journal of Experimental Biology 211:2101-2104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.014571

Wu W, Moreno AM, Tangen JM, Reinhard J (2013) Honeybees can discriminate between Monet and Picasso paintings. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 199:45-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-012-0767-5

Zhang S, Srinivasan MV, Zhu H, Wong J (2004) Grouping of visual objects by honeybees. Journal of Experimental Biology 207:3289-3298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01155

Published

2017-02-08

How to Cite

Ne'eman, G., & Ne'eman, R. (2017). Factors determining visual detection distance to real flowers by bumble bees. Journal of Pollination Ecology, 20, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2017)one

Issue

Section

Articles