Typology in pollination biology:  Lessons from an historical critique

Nickolas Waser; Jeff Ollerton; Andreas Erhardt

doi:10.26786/1920-7603(2011)2

Authors

Nickolas Waser
Jeff Ollerton
Andreas Erhardt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2011)2

Keywords:

Darwinism, Federico Delpino, Hermann MÃ¼ller, history, natural history, pollination syndromes, teleology, typology

Abstract

Typological schemes that describe putative floral adaptations for pollinators have played a central role in pollination biology. In 1882 the prominent German botanist and Darwinist Hermann Müller commented critically on a precursor of modern versions of such “pollination syndromes” that had been developed by his Italian colleague Federico Delpino. Delpino also was a self-proclaimed Darwinist, but in fact adhered to teleology—explanation beyond nature. As a consequence he viewed his typology as reflecting a deeper ideal and thus as rigidly true, and rejected as unimportant any visitors to flowers that it did not predict. Although Müller also classified flowers as to pollinators, he considered such schemes to be fallible, and pondered what diversity and variation in floral visitors might mean. Müller’s comments, which we translate here, are of interest given that appeals to teleology have resurfaced from time to time in discussions of pollination syndromes, and more importantly because his warning against taking typological schemes too literally remains valid. Typology is a useful tool in biology, including pollination biology, but care must be taken that it does not replace nature as perceived reality.

References

Aigner PA (2001) Optimality modeling and fitness tradeoffs: When should plants become pollinator specialists? Oikos 95: 177-184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.950121.x

Armbruster WS (1997) Exaptations link evolution of plant-herbivore and plant-pollinator interactions: A phylogenetic inquiry. Ecology 78:1661–1672 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1661:ELEOPH]2.0.CO;2

Baker HG (1983) An outline of the history of anthecology, or pollination biology. In Real LA (ed) Pollination biology. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 7-28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-583980-8.50009-0

Bekoff M, Allen C (1995) Teleology, function, design and the evolution of animal behaviour. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:253–255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89082-5

Buchmann SL (1983) Buzz pollination in angiosperms. In: Jones CE, Little RJ (eds) Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 73–113

Clemens S (1880) A tramp abroad, Appendix D: The awful German language. American Publishing Company, Hartford, Connecticut

Delpino F (1873–1874) Ulteriori osservazioni e considerazioni sulla Dicogamia nel regno vegetale. Atti della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali 16:151–349, 17:266–407

Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1979) The principles of pollination ecology, 3rd revised edition. Pergamon Press, Oxford DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-023160-0.50020-7

Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD (2004) Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35:375–403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132347

Hingston AB, McQuillan PB (2000) Are pollination syndromes useful predictors of floral visitors in Tasmania? Austral Ecology 25:600–609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2000.tb00065.x

Knapp S (2010) On ‘various contrivances’: Pollination, phylogeny and flower form in the Solanaceae. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society series B. 365:449-460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0236

Knuth P (1898a) Handbuch der Blütenbiologie. I. Band: Einleitung und Litteratur. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig

Knuth P (1898b) Handbuch der Blütenbiologie. II. Band: Die bisher in Europa und im arktischen Gebiet gemachten blütenbiologischen Beobachtungen. 1. Teil: Ranunculaceae bis Compositae. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig

Knuth P (1899) Handbuch der Blütenbiologie. II. Band: Die bisher in Europa und im arktischen Gebiet gemachten blütenbiologischen Beobachtungen. 2. Teil: Lobeliaceae bis Gnetaceae. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig

Lamborn E, Ollerton J (2000) Experimental assessment of the functional morphology of inflorescences of Daucus carota (Apiaceae): Testing the "fly catcher effect". Functional Ecology 14:445–454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00440.x

Linnaeus, C (1735) Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Theodore Haak, Leiden

Mayr E (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science 134:1502–1506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.134.3489.1501

Mayr E (1982) The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution and inheritance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

Mayr E (1991) One long argument: Charles Darwin and the genesis of modern evolutionary thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

Müller H (1873) Die Befruchtung der Blumen durch Insekten, und die gegenseitigen Anpassungen beider. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.50246

Müller H (1881) Die Alpenblumen, ihre Befruchtung durch Insekten und ihre Anpassungen an dieselben. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig

Müller H (1882) Weitere Beobachtungen über Befruchtung der Blumen durch Insekten, Teil III. Verhandlungen des naturhistorischen Vereines der preussischen Rheinlande und Westfalens, Neununddreissigster Jahrgang. Vierte Folge: 9. Jahrgang, 1–104

Ollerton J (1996) Reconciling ecological processes with phylogenetic patterns: The apparent paradox of plant-pollinator systems. Journal of Ecology 84:767–769 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2261338

Ollerton J, Alarcón R, Waser NM, Price MV, Watts S, Cranmer L, Hingston A, Peter CI, Rotenberry J (2009) A global test of the pollination syndrome hypothesis. Annals of Botany 103:1471–1480 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp031

Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S (2011) How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120:321-326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x

Pancaldi G (1984) Teleologia e Darwinismo. La corrispondenza tra Charles Darwin e Federico Delpino. Cooperativa Libraria Editrice, Bologna

Pittendrigh, CS (1958) Adaptation, natural selection, and behavior. In: Roe A, Simpson GG (eds) Behavior and evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 390–416

Price MV, Billick I (2010) Building an understanding of place. In: Billick I, Price MV (eds) The ecology of place: Contributions of place-based research to ecological understanding. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 177-183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226050447.001.0001

Proctor M, Yeo P, Lack A (1996) The natural history of pollination. HarperCollins, London

Reiss JO (2009) Not by design: Retiring Darwin’s watchmaker. University of California Press, Berkeley DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520944404

Schneckenburger S (2009) Kurzbiografie Hermann Müller—Blütenbiologe, Darwinist und Pädagoge: Am Anfang war der Kohlenstoff. Laborjournal 5:12-14

Schneckenburger S (2010) Fritz Müller-Desterro, Naturforscher: “Fürst der Beobachter”. Laborjournal 9:40-43

Smith S, Ané C, Baum DA (2008) The role of pollinator shifts in the floral diversification of Iochroma (Solanaceae). Evolution 62:793–806 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00327.x

Soontiëns FJK (1991) Evolution: Teleology or chance? Journal for General Philosophy of Science 22:133–141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801253

Sprengel CK (1793) Das entdeckte Geheimniss der Natur im Bau und in der Befruchtung der Blumen. Friedrich Vieweg dem aeltern, Berlin DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.13716

Vogel S (1954) Blütenbiologische Typen als Elemente der Sippengliederung, dargestellt anhand der Flora Südafrikas. Botanische Studien 1:1–338

Vogel, S (1996) Christian Konrad Sprengel’s theory of the flower: The cradle of floral ecology. In: Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH (eds) Floral ecology: Studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 44–62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1165-2_2

Vogel S (2006) Floral syndromes: Empiricism versus typology. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 127:5–11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1127/0006-8152/2006/0127-0005

Waser NM (1998) Pollination, angiosperm speciation, and the nature of species boundaries. Oikos 82:198–201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3546930

Waser NM (2006) Specialization and generalization in plant-pollinator interactions: An historical perspective. In: Waser NM, Ollerton J (eds) Plant-pollinator interactions: From specialization to generalization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 3–17

Waser NM, Chittka L, Price MV, Williams NM, Ollerton J (1996) Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77:1043–1060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2265575