The concentration and energetic content of floral nectar sugars: calculation, conversions, and common confusions

Jonathan G Pattrick; Jennifer Scott; Geraldine A Wright

doi:10.26786/1920-7603(2025)821

Authors

Jonathan G Pattrick University of Oxford https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6587-5500
Jennifer Scott https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5714-0106
Geraldine A Wright https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2749-021X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2025)821

Keywords:

sucrose, fructose, glucose, molarity, % w/w, % w/v

Abstract

The sugar concentration of floral nectar is a key metric for describing nectar composition and a major factor influencing pollinator visitation to flowers. Across pollination biology research there are multiple approaches in use for describing nectar sugar concentration. With these different approaches there are several potential sources of confusion which, if not accounted for, can lead to errors. Further potential for error arises if researchers wish to make comparisons between the energetic content of nectars containing different ratios of sucrose, fructose and glucose. Regardless of whether concentration is measured per mole or per unit mass, the energetic content differs between the hexose sugars (glucose and fructose) and sucrose. Appropriate conversion is needed for direct comparison. Here we address these two issues with the following aims. We consolidate the literature on this topic with examples of the different methods for reporting nectar sugar concentrations, provide insight into potential sources of error, and derive equations for converting between the different ways of expressing sugar concentration for the three primary nectar sugars: sucrose, glucose and fructose. Second, we discuss the relative energetic content of sucrose, glucose, and fructose, and rationalise adjustment of ‘energetic value’ rather than reporting concentration directly. In this way, we hope to harmonise ongoing work in pollination ecology.

Author Biographies

Jonathan G Pattrick, University of Oxford

Geraldine A Wright

References

Abrahamczyk S, Kessler M, Hanley D, Karger DN, Müller MPJ, Knauer AC, Keller F, Schwerdtfeger M, Humphreys AM (2017) Pollinator adaptation and the evolution of floral nectar sugar composition. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 30:112–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12991

Allsopp MH, Nicolson SW, Jackson S (1998) Xylose as a nectar sugar: the response of Cape honeybees, Apis mellifera capensis Eschscholtz (Hymenoptera: Apidae). African Entomology 6:317–323.

Bailes EJ, Pattrick JG, Glover BJ (2018) An analysis of the energetic reward offered by field bean (Vicia faba) flowers: nectar, pollen and operative force. Ecology and evolution 8:3161–3171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3851

Baker HG, Baker I (1983) Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type. In: Jones CE, Little RJ (eds) Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Ltd, Wokingham, UK

Balfour NJ, Gandy S, Ratnieks FLW (2015) Exploitative competition alters bee foraging and flower choice. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 69:1731–1738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1985-y

Barlow SE, Wright GA, Ma C, Barberis M, Farrell IW, Marr EC, Brankin A, Pavlik BM, Stevenson PC (2017) Distasteful nectar deters floral robbery. Current Biology 27:2552-2558.e3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.012

Bates FJ (Ed) (1942) Polarimetry, Saccharimetry and the Sugars. Circular of NBS C440. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington , DC.

Bertazzini M, Forlani G (2016) Intraspecific Variability of Floral Nectar Volume and Composition in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L. var. oleifera). Frontiers in Plant Science 7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00288

Bolten AB, Feinsinger P, Baker HG, Baker I (1979) On the Calculation of Sugar Concentration in Flower Nectar. Oecologia 41:301–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377434

Broadhead GT, Raguso RA (2021) Associative learning of non-sugar nectar components: amino acids modify nectar preference in a hawkmoth. Journal of Experimental Biology 224:jeb234633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.234633

Brown M, Brown MJF (2020) Nectar preferences in male bumblebees. Insectes Sociaux DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-020-00751-y

Brown M, Downs CT, Johnson SD (2008) Sugar preferences of nectar feeding birds – a comparison of experimental techniques. Journal of Avian Biology 39:479–483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0908-8857.2008.04394.x

Darros‐Barbosa R, Balaban MO, Teixeira AA (2003) Temperature and Concentration Dependence of Density of Model Liquid Foods. International Journal of Food Properties 6:195–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/JFP-120017815

Fleming PA, Hartman Bakken B, Lotz CN, Nicolson SW (2004) Concentration and temperature effects on sugar intake and preferences in a sunbird and a hummingbird. Functional Ecology 18:223–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00818.x

Fleming PA, Xie S, Napier K, McWhorter TJ, Nicolson SJ (2008) Nectar concentration affects sugar preferences in two honeyeaters and a lorikeet. Functional Ecology 22:599–605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01401.x

Fucaloro AF, Pu Y, Cha K, Williams A, Conrad K (2007) Partial Molar Volumes and Refractions of Aqueous Solutions of Fructose, Glucose, Mannose, and Sucrose at 15.00, 20.00, and 25.00 °C. Journal of Solution Chemistry 36:61–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-006-9100-7

Göttlinger T, Lohaus G (2024) Origin and Function of Amino Acids in Nectar and Nectaries of Pitcairnia Species with Particular Emphasis on Alanine and Glutamine. Plants 13:23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13010023

Grassl J, Holt S, Cremen N, Peso M, Hahne D, Baer B (2018) Synergistic effects of pathogen and pesticide exposure on honey bee (Apis mellifera) survival and immunity. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 159:78–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2018.10.005

Guiraud M, Roper M, Wolf S, Woodgate JL, Chittka L (2022) Discrimination of edge orientation by bumblebees. PLOS ONE 17:e0263198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263198

Harder LD (1986) Effects of nectar concentration and flower depth on flower handling efficiency of bumble bees. Oecologia 69:309–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377639

Harrison JF, Roberts SP (2000) Flight Respiration and Energetics. Annual Review of Physiology 62:179–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.62.1.179

Heinrich B (1975) Energetics of Pollination. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 6:139–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.06.110175.001035

Hemingway CT, Pimplikar S, Muth F (2024) Wild bumblebees use both absolute and relative evaluation when foraging. Behavioral Ecology 35:1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arad112

Hepburn HR, Pirk CWW, Duangphakdee O (2014) Honeybee Nests: Composition, Structure, Function Hepburn HR, Pirk CWW, Duangphakdee O (eds). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54328-9

Hiebert SM, Calder WA (1983) Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride in Floral Nectars: Energy‐Free Contributions to Refractive Index and Salt Balance. Ecology 64:399–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1937086

Inouye DW, Favre ND, Lanum JA, Levine DM, Meyers JB, Roberts MS, Tsao FC, Wang Y (1980) The Effects of Nonsugar Nectar Constituents on Estimates of Nectar Energy Content. Ecology 61:992–996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1936767

Jones PL, Ryan MJ, Chittka L (2015) The influence of past experience with flower reward quality on social learning in bumblebees. Animal Behaviour 101:11–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.12.016

Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for Pollination Biologists. University Press of Colorado.

Leseigneur CDC, Nicolson SW (2009) Nectar concentration preferences and sugar intake in the white-bellied sunbird, Cinnyris talatala (Nectariniidae). J Comp Physiol B 179:673–679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-009-0348-2

Lide DR (2004) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 84th edn. CRC Press.

Miriyala A, Kessler S, Rind FC, Wright GA (2018) Burst firing in bee gustatory neurons prevents adaptation. Current Biology 28:1585-1594.e3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.070

Nepi M, Selvi F, Pacini E (2010) Variation in nectar–sugar profile of Anchusa and allied genera (Boraginaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 162:616–627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01036.x

Nicolson SW (2007) Nectar Consumers. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E (eds) Nectaries and Nectar. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 289–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5937-7_7

Nicolson SW (2022) Sweet solutions: nectar chemistry and quality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 377:20210163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0163

Nicolson SW, Thornburg RW (2007) Nectar chemistry. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E (eds) Nectaries and Nectar. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 215–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5937-7_5

Parkinson RH, Kessler SC, Scott J, Simpson A, Bu J, Al-Esawy M, Mahdi A, Miriyala A, Wright GA (2022) Temporal responses of bumblebee gustatory neurons to sugars. iScience 25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.28.482341

Petanidou T (2005) Sugars in Mediterranean Floral Nectars: An Ecological and Evolutionary Approach. Journal of Chemical Ecology 31:1065–1088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-005-4248-y

Pille Arnold J, Tylianakis JM, Murphy MV, Cawthray GR, Webber BL, Didham RK (2024) Body-size-dependent effects of landscape-level resource energetics on pollinator abundance in woodland remnants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.2771

Prŷs-Jones O, Corbet S (2011) Bumblebees, 3rd edn. Pelagic Publishing, Exeter, UK.

R Core Team (2023) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Version 3.4.2), Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.

Rering CC, Vannette RL, Schaeffer RN, Beck JJ (2020) Microbial Co-Occurrence in Floral Nectar Affects Metabolites and Attractiveness to a Generalist Pollinator. Journal of Chemical Ecology 46:659–667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-020-01169-3

Roubik DW, Yanega D, Aluja MS, Buchmann S, Inouye D (1995) On optimal nectar foraging by some tropical bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Apidologie 26:197–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:19950303

Santos LC dos, Condotta R, Ferreira M do C (2018) Flow properties of coarse and fine sugar powders. Journal of Food Process Engineering 41:e12648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.12648

Schmid S, Schmid VS, Zillikens A, Harter-Marques B, Steiner J (2011) Bimodal pollination system of the bromeliad Aechmea nudicaulis involving hummingbirds and bees. Plant Biology Suppl. 1:41–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00348.x

Siviter H, Scott A, Pasquier G, Pull CD, Brown MJF, Leadbeater E (2019) No evidence for negative impacts of acute sulfoxaflor exposure on bee olfactory conditioning or working memory. PeerJ 7:e7208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7208

Stiles FG (1976) Taste Preferences, Color Preferences, and Flower Choice in Hummingbirds. The Condor 78:10–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1366912

Symington HA, Glover BJ (2024) Strawberry varieties differ in pollinator‐relevant floral traits. Ecology and Evolution 14:e10914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10914

Venjakob C, Ruedenauer FA, Klein AM, Leonhardt SD (2022) Variation in nectar quality across 34 grassland plant species. Plant Biology 24:134–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.13343

Waller GD, Carpenter EW, Ziehl OA (1972) Potassium in Onion Nectar and its Probable Effect on Attractiveness of Onion Flowers to Honey Bees1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 97:535–539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.97.4.535

Whitney HM, Dyer A, Chittka L, Rands SA, Glover BJ (2008) The interaction of temperature and sucrose concentration on foraging preferences in bumblebees. Naturwissenschaften 95:845–850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-008-0393-9

Zhou Y, Ding S, Liao C, Wu J, Chittka L, Solvi C, Peng F (2024) Bumble bees’ food preferences are jointly shaped by rapid evaluation of nectar sugar concentration and viscosity. Animal Behaviour 210:419–427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.02.006