Criticism mismatched: Response to de Keyzer et al. 2016


  • Nicole Miller-Struttmann Webster University
  • Jennifer C. Geib Appalachian State University
  • Candace Galen University of Missouri



In a recent paper, we reported on the evolution of shorter tongues in two alpine bumble bee species in response to climate-induced flower deficits. De Keyzer et al. concede that tongue lengths have decreased but criticize the level of support for our claims.  Here, we address the alternative mechanisms they proposed, highlight evidence presented in the supplementary material, and elaborate on the support for our claims in the literature.  De Keyzer et al.’s criticisms reflect concerns about the misrepresentation of our work in the popular press. To clarify, we do not imply that evolutionary rescue is necessarily a prudent conservation strategy; we illustrate that remote bumble bee populations buffered from other environmental stressors have undergone an adaptive evolutionary response to dwindling resources under climate change.




How to Cite

Miller-Struttmann, N., Geib, J. C., & Galen, C. (2016). Criticism mismatched: Response to de Keyzer et al. 2016. Journal of Pollination Ecology, 19, 88–92.



Opinion papers