Production of floral morphs in cleistogamous Ruellia brevifolia (Pohl) C. Ezcurra (Acanthaceae) at different levels of water availability

Amanda Soares Miranda; Milene Faria Vieira

doi:10.26786/1920-7603(2016)8

Authors

Amanda Soares Miranda Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Milene Faria Vieira Universidade Federal de Viçosa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2016)8

Abstract

In this study we investigated whether the production of cleistogamous (CL) and chasmogamous (CH) floral morphs in Ruellia brevifolia is affected by water availability. To this end, the effects of two water levels were tested on plants grown in a greenhouse: soil at 100% water-holding capacity (WHC) (moist soil) and at 50% WHC (water scarcity). Additionally, we investigated fruit and seed production in plants at these two levels of water availability and evaluated whether the drought stress interferes with vegetative growth. The production of floral morphs depended on water availability: plants in moist soil produced only CH morphs and water-stressed plants produced only CL morphs. Fruit production was higher at the higher level of water availability (30.5 ± 28.20 fruits/plant at 100% WHC versus 9 ± 6.04 fruits/plant at 50% WHC; t = 4.384; P < 0.01). The mean number of seeds produced by CH and CL morphs were, respectively, 5.93 ± 2.24 and 8.17 ± 2.07 seeds/fruit (t = - 3.304; P < 0.01). Although CL morphs produced a greater number of seeds, the total seed production per plant was higher in plants at 100% WHC (180.86 seeds/plant in CH morphs versus 73.53 seeds/plant in CL morphs of plants in soil at 100% and 50% WHC, respectively; t = - 2.759; P < 0.01). The plants in soil at 100% WHC were taller (0.48 m ± 0.07) in relation to plants in soil at 50% WHC (0.24 m ± 0.04) (t = 1.781; P < 0.01). This study provides new information about the sexual reproductive strategy of R. brevifolia, indicating that the main factor inducing cleistogamy is drought stress.

Author Biographies

Amanda Soares Miranda, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Núcleo em Ecologia e Desenvolvimento Socioambiental de Macaé

Milene Faria Vieira, Universidade Federal de Viçosa

Departament of Botany

References

Abreu CRM, Vieira MF (2004) Os beija-flores e seus recursos florais em um fragmento florestal de Viçosa, sudeste brasileiro. Lundiana 5: 129-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35699/2675-5327.2004.22014

Birch HF (1964) Mineralization of plant nitrogen following alternate wet and dry conditions. Plant Soil 20: 43-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01378096

Braz DM, Carvalho-Okano RM, Kameyama C (2002) Acanthaceae da Reserva Florestal Mata do Paraíso, Viçosa, Minas Gerais. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 25: 495-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042002012000013

Braz DM, Vieira MF, Carvalho-Okano RM (2000) Aspectos reprodutivos de espécies de Acanthaceae Juss. de um fragmento florestal do município de Viçosa, Minas Gerais. Revista Ceres 47: 229-239.

Brown WV (1952) The relation of soil moisture to cleistogamy in Stipa leucotricha. Botanical Gazette 113: 438-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/335732

Ezcurra, C (1993) Systematics of Ruellia (Acanthaceae) in southern South America. Annals of Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 787-845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2399931

Freire JC, Ribeiro MSV, Bahia VG, Lopes AS, Aquino LH (1980) Resposta do milho cultivado em casa de vegetação a níveis de água em solos da região de Lavras (MG). Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 4: 5-8.

Galen C, Sherry R, Carroll A (1999) Are flowers physiological sinks or faucets? Costs and correlates of water use by flowers of Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia 118: 461-470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050749

Garrido MAT, Del Pino MAIT, Silva AM, Andrade MJB (2000) Crescimento, absorção iônica e produção do feijoeiro sob dois níveis de nitrogênio e três lâminas de irrigação. Ciências Agrotécnicas de Lavras 24: 187-194.

Griffith CJ (1996) Distribution of Viola blanda in relation to within-habitat variation in canopy openness, soil phosphorus and magnesium. Bulletin of Torrey Botanical Club 123: 281-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2996776

Hexslow G (1888) Cleistogamy. Nature 39: 104-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/039104a0

Langer RHM, Wilson D (1965) Environmental control of cleistogamy in prairie grass (Bromus unioloides H. B. K.). New Phytologist 64: 80-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1965.tb05377.x

Larcher W (2004) Ecofisiologia Vegetal. Rima, São Carlos.

Le Corff J (1993) Effects of light and nutrient availability on chasmogamy and cleistogamy in an understory tropical herb, Calathea micans (Marantaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 1392–1399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1993.tb15383.x

Lima NAS, Vieira MF (2006) Fenologia de floração e sistema reprodutivo de três espécies de Ruellia (Acanthaceae) em fragmento florestal de Viçosa, Sudeste brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 29: 681-687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042006000400017

Lima NAS, Vieira MF, Carvalho-Okano RM, Azevedo AA (2005) Cleistogamia em Ruellia menthoides (Nees) Hiern e Ruellia brevifolia (Pohl) C. Ezcurra (Acanthaceae) em fragmento florestal do Sudeste brasileiro. Acta Botanica Brasilica 19: 443-449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062005000300004

Lord EM (1981) Cleistogamy: a tool for the study of floral morphogenesis, function and evolution. The Botanical Review 47: 421-449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860538

Minter TC, Lord EM (1983) Effects of water stress, abscisic acid, and gibberellic acid on flower production and differentiation in the cleistogamous species Collomia grandiflora Dougl. ex Lindl. (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 70: 618–624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1983.tb07890.x

Miranda AS, Vieira MF (2014) Ruellia subsessilis (Nees) Lindau (Acanthaceae): a species with a sexual reproductive system that responds to different water availability levels. Flora 209: 711-717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2014.09.007

Munguías-Rosas MA, Parra-Tabla V, Ollerton J, Cervera C (2012) Environmental control of reproductive phenology and the effect of pollen supplementation on resource allocation in the cleistogamous weed, Ruellia nudiflora (Acanthaceae). Annals of Botany 109: 343-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr284

Pezzopane JEM (2001) Caracterização microclimática, ecofisiológica e fitossociológica em uma floresta estacional semidecidual secundária, em Viçosa, MG. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa (Dr tese).

Piovano M, Galetto L, Bernardello L (1995) Floral morphology, nectar features and breeding system in Ruellia brevifolia (Acanthaceae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 55: 409-418.

Schemske DW (1978) Evolution of reproductive characteristics in Impatiens (Balsaminaceae): the significance of cleistogamy and chasmogamy. Ecology 59: 596-613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1936588

Sigrist MR, Sazima M (2002) Ruellia brevifolia (Pohl) Ezcurra (Acanthaceae): fenologia da floração, biologia da polinização e reprodução. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 25: 35-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042002000100006

Tripp EA (2007) Evolutionary relationships within the species-rich genus Ruellia (Acanthaceae). Systematic Botany 32: 628-649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1600/036364407782250625

Webster TM & Grey TL (2008) Growth and reproduction of benghal dayflower (Commelina benghalensis) in response to drought stress. Weed Science 56: 561-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-07-186.1

Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall International, New Jersey.