The floral bat lure dimethyl disulphide does not attract the palaeotropical Dawn bat

Gerald G Carter; Alyssa B Stewart

doi:10.26786/1920-7603(2015)19

Authors

Gerald G Carter University of Maryland
Alyssa B Stewart University of Maryland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2015)19

Abstract

In the neotropics, dimethyl disulphide (DMDS) is innately attractive to flower-visiting bats, and acts as a powerful bat lure in the scent bouquets of many bat-pollinated flowers. At first, DMDS appeared to be part of a general bat pollination syndrome. However, DMDS is absent in many bat-pollinated flowers of West Africa, and it is unclear whether palaeotropical flower-visiting bats are also attracted to it. Furthermore, DMDS was previously observed in neotropical, but not palaeotropical, populations of Ceiba pentandra (Malvaceae, Bombacoideae). We tested for an attraction to DMDS in the most common flower-visiting bat in Thailand, the dawn bat Eonycteris spelaea. We gave bats choices of Ceiba pentandra flowers, where one random flower was scented with DMDS. Rather than preferring the DMDS-treated flower, 21 of 22 bats chose an untreated flower, showing no attraction to DMDS. Alongside past evidence, this result suggests that the role of DMDS in bat pollination syndromes may result from an adaptive convergence that is limited to the neotropics. This hypothesis could be tested through comparative studies of (1) attraction across bats, (2) floral DMDS presence across bat-pollinated plants in Asia, and (3) floral DMDS measures across New and Old World populations of Ceiba pentandra.

Author Biographies

Gerald G Carter, University of Maryland

Department of Biology

Alyssa B Stewart, University of Maryland

Department of Biology

References

Bestmann HJ, Winkler L, von Helversen O (1997) Headspace analysis of volatile flower scent constituents of bat-pollinated plants. Phytochemistry 29:1359-1387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(97)80004-0

Carter GG, Ratcliffe JM, Galef BG (2010) Flower bats (Glossophaga soricina) and fruit bats (Carollia perspicillata) rely on spatial cues over shapes and scents when relocating food. PLOS One 5:e10808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010808

Datzmann T, von Helversen O, Mayer F (2010) Evolution of nectarivory in phyllostomid bats (Phyllostomidae Gray, 1825, Chiroptera: Mammalia). BMC Evolutionary Biology 10:165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-10-165

Dávalos LM, Cirranello AL, Geisler JH, Simmons NB (2012) Understanding phylogenetic incongruence: lessons from phyllostomid bats. Biological Reviews 87, 991-1024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00240.x

Elangovan V, Priya EYS, Marimuthu G (2006) Olfactory discrimination ability in the short-nosed fruit bat Cynopterus sphinx. Acta Chiropterologica 8:247-253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3161/1733-5329(2006)8[247:ODAOTS]2.0.CO;2

Fleming TH, Geiselman C, Kress WJ (2009) The evolution of bat pollination: a phylogenetic perspective. Annals of Botany 104:1017-1043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp197

Griffiths TA (1982) Systematics of the New World nectar-feeding bats (Mammalia, Phyllostomidae), based on the morphology of the hyoid and lingual regions. American Museum Novitates 2742:1-45.

Jones KE, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Gittleman JL (2005) Bats, clocks, and rocks: diversification patterns in Chiroptera. Evolution 59:2243-2255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00932.x

Jürgens A, Dötterl S, Meve U (2006) The chemical nature of fetid floral odours in stapeliads (Apocynaceae-Asclepiadoideae-Ceropegieae). New Phytologist 172:452-468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01845.x

Knudsen JT, Tollsten L (1995) Floral scent in bat-pollinated plants: a case of convergent evolution. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 119:45-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1995.tb00728.x

Pettersson S, Ervik F, Knudsen JT (2004) Floral scent of bat-pollinated species: West Africa vs. The New World. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 82:161-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00317.x

Rosas-Guerrero V, Aguilar R, Martén-Rodríguez S, Ashworth L, Lopezaraiza-Mikel M, Bastida JM, Quesada M (2014). A quantitative review of pollination syndromes: do floral traits predict effective pollinators? Ecology Letters 17:388-400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12224

Singer AG, Agosta W, O'Connell R, Pfaffmann C, Bowen D, and Field F (1976). Dimethyl disulfide: an attractant pheromone in hamster vaginal secretion. Science 191:948-950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251205

Shuttleworth A, Johnson SD (2010) The missing stink: sulphur compounds can mediate a shift between fly and wasp pollination systems. Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277: 2811–2819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0491

Stensmyr MC, Urru I, Collu I, Celander M, Hansson BS, Angioy, AM (2002) Pollination: rotting smell of dead-horse arum florets. Nature 420:625-626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/420625a

Teeling EC, Springer MS, Madsen O, Bates P, O'Brien SJ, Murphy WJ (2005) A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record. Science 307:580–584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1105113

von Helversen O, Winkler L, Bestmann HJ (2000) Sulphur-containing ‘perfumes’ attract flower-visiting bats. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 186:143–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590050014