Pollinators may not limit native seed set at puget lowland prairie restoration nurseries

Jennie F. Husby; Carri J. LeRoy; Cheryl Fimbel

doi:10.26786/1920-7603(2015)4

Authors

Jennie F. Husby Graduate Program on the Environment The Evergreen State College
Carri J. LeRoy The Evergreen State College
Cheryl Fimbel Center for Natural Lands Management

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2015)4

Abstract

Land managers often rely on large-scale production of native seeds in nurseries for replanting into natural environments as part of restoration strategies. Nursery managers question if unmanaged insects can be sufficient to pollinate large increases in native forbs planted into young nurseries in non-native landscapes. This study investigated pollination of deltoid balsamroot (Balsamorhiza deltoidea Nutt.) and sicklekeel lupine (Lupinus albicaulis Douglas) at a native seed nursery compared to dense patches of native plants at a natural Puget lowland prairie to determine if insect visitation affected viable seed production for those two species. In 2011 and 2012, insect visitation rates were recorded for each plant species at more than 62 plots within two study areas. In 2012, seeds were collected from hand-pollinated and naturally-pollinated inflorescences and tested for viability. Overall visitation rates were significantly higher at the nursery than the prairie for both plant species. However, pollen limitation was not evident for either plant species at either site. Natural pollination by insects and supplemental hand-cross-pollination treatments did not yield different quantities of viable seed. Factors other than pollinator visitation, such as soil nutrients and seed handling practices, may be influencing seed viability, but increasing insect visitation will not likely significantly increase seed viability for these two species at this restoration nursery. Planting dense rows of native plant species may be enough to attract a sufficient amount of unmanaged insects to provide adequate pollination for seed production for some species at even young nurseries.

Author Biographies

Jennie F. Husby, Graduate Program on the Environment The Evergreen State College

Carri J. LeRoy, The Evergreen State College

Cheryl Fimbel, Center for Natural Lands Management

References

Arroyo MTK, Armesto JJ, Primack RB (1985) Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of central Chile II. Effect of temperature on visitation rates and pollination possibilities. Plant Systematics and Evolution 149:187-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983305

Arroyo MT, Primack R, Armesto J (1982) Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of central Chile I. Pollination mechanisms and altitudinal variation. American Journal of Botany 69:82-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1982.tb13237.x

Ashman T, Knight TM, Steets JA, Amarasekare P, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MR, Johnston MO, Mazer SJ, Mitchell RJ, Morgan MT, Wilson WG (2004) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: Ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85:2408-2421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/03-8024

Berry PE, Calvo RN (1989) Wind pollination, self-incompatibility, and altitudinal shifts in pollination systems in the high Andean genus Espeletia (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 76:1602-1614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1989.tb15145.x

Bos MM, Veddeler D, Bogdanski AK, Klein A, Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tylainakis JM (2007) Caveats to quantifying ecosystem services: Fruit abortion blurs benefits from crop pollination. Ecological Applications 17:1841-1849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1763.1

Cane JH, Schiffhauer D (2003) Dose-response relationships between pollination and fruiting refine pollinator comparisons for cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon [Ericaceae]). American Journal of Botany 90:1425-1432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.10.1425

Corbet SA (1998) Fruit and seed production in relation to pollination and resources in Bluebell, Hyacinthoides non-scripta. Oecologia 114:349-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050457

Dieringer G (1992) Pollinator limitation in populations of Agalinis strictifolia (Scrophulariaceae). Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 119:131-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2997024

Donovall L, vanEngelsdorp D (2008) Pennsylvania Native Bee Survey Citizen Scientist Pollinator Monitoring Guide. The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation. [online] URL: www.xerces.org/download/pdf/PA_Xerces%20Guide.pdf (accessed April 2011).

Dunwiddie PW, Bakker JD (2011) The future of restoration and management of prairie-oak ecosystems in the Pacific Northwest. Northwest Science 85:83-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3955/046.085.0201

Engel EC, Irwin RE (2003) Linking pollinator visitation rate and pollen receipt. American Journal of Botany 90:1612-1618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.11.1612

Fazzino L, Kirkpatrick HE, Fimbel C (2011) Comparison of hand-pollinated and naturally-pollinated Puget balsamroot (Balsamorhiza deltoidea Nutt.) to determine pollinator limitations on South Puget Sound lowland prairies. Northwest Science 85: 352-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3955/046.085.0220

Fontaine C, Dajoz I, Meriguet J, Loreau M (2006) Functional diversity of plant-pollinator interaction webs enhances the persistence of plant communities. PLoS Biology 4:0129-0135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040001

Frankie GW, Thorp RW, Hernandez J, Rizzardi M, Ertter B, Pawelek JC, Witt SL, Schindler M, Coville R, Wojcik VA (2009) Native bees are a rich natural resource in urban California gardens. University of California. California Agriculture [online] URL: http://californiaagriculture.ucanr.edu (accessed Oct 2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v063n03p113

Goodell K (2003) Food availability affects Osmia pumila (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) foraging, reproduction, and brood parasitism. Oecologia 134:518-527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1159-2

Greenleaf SS, Williams NM, Winfree R, Kremen C (2007) Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia 153(3):589-596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0752-9

Hagen M, Wikelski M, Kissling WD (2011) Space use of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) revealed by radio-tracking. PLoS ONE 6(5):e19997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019997

Hegland SJ, Totland O (2008) Is the magnitude of pollen limitation in a plant community affected by pollinator visitation and plant species specialization levels? Oikos 117:883-891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16561.x

Heschel MS, Page KN (1995) Inbreeding depression, environmental stress, and population size variation in scarlet gilia (Ipomopsis aggregata). Conservation Biology 9:126-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09010126.x

Hitchcock CL, Cronquist A (1998) Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle and London.

Inouye DW, Pyke GH (1988) Pollination in the snowy mountains of Australia: Comparisons with montane Colorado, USA. Australian Journal of Ecology 13:191-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1988.tb00968.x

International Seed Testing Association (2012) International Rules for Seed Testing (2012ed.). Bassersdorf: Switzerland.

Kaye TN (1999) Obligate insect pollination of a rare plant, Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii. Northwest Science 73:50-52.

Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for Pollination Biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot.

Kittelson PM, Maron JL (2000) Outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression in the perennial yellow bush lupine, Lupinus arboreus (fabaceae). American Journal of Botany 87:652-660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2656851

Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA, Gemmill-Herren B, LeBuhn G, Minckley R, Packer L, Potts SG, Roulston T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Vazquez DP, Winfree R, Adams L, Crone EE, Greenleaf SS, Keitt TH, Klein A, Regetz J, Ricketts TH (2007) Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: A conceptual framework for effects of land-use change. Ecology Letters 10:299-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01018.x

Kunin WE (1993) Sex and the single mustard: population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed-set. Ecology 74:2145-2160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1940859

Manly BFJ (2007) Randomization, Bootstrap, and Monte Carlo methods in biology (3rd ed.). Chapman & Hall, London.

Matteson KC, Grace JB, Minor ES (2012) Direct and indirect effects of land use on floral resources and flower-visiting insects across an urban landscape. Oikos 116:1588-1598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20229.x

Mayer C, Adler L, Armbruster S, Dafni A, Eardley C, Huang S, Kevan PG, Ollerton J, Packer L, Ssymank A, Stout JC, Potts SG (2011) Pollination ecology in the 21st century: Key questions for future research. Journal of Pollination Ecology 3:8-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2011)1

McCall C, Primack RB (1992) Influence of flower characteristics, weather, time of day, and season on insect visitation rates in three plant communities. American Journal of Botany 79:434-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1992.tb14571.x

McCarty JP (2001) Ecological consequences of recent climate change. Conservation Biology 15:320-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015002320.x

Morey M and Bakker J (2011) Effects of light and temperature regimes on germination and viability of native WA prairie species. Undergraduate senior project. School of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (2012) Plants Database. [online] URL: www.plants.usda.gov (accessed Oct 2012).

Perfectti F, Gomez JM, Bosch J (2009) The functional consequences of diversity in plant-pollinator interactions. Oikos 118:1430-1440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17491.x

Price MV, Campbell DR, Waser NM, Brody AK (2008) Bridging the generation gap in plants: Pollination, parental fecundity, and offspring demography. Ecology 89:1596-1604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0614.1

Stanley AG, Kaye TN, Dunwiddie PW (2008) Regional strategies for restoring invaded prairies: Observations from a multisite, collaborative research project. Native Plants Journal 9:247-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/NPJ.2008.9.3.247

Stephenson AG (1981) Flower and fruit abortion: Proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12:253-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.12.110181.001345

Stinson DW (2005) Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. Washington State status report for the Mazama pocket gopher, streaked horned lark, and Taylor’s checker spot. Olympia.

Tscheulin T, Petanidou T (2011) Does spatial population structure affect seed set in pollen-limited Thymus capitatus? Apidologie 42:67-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido/2010035

U.S. Climate Data (2014) [online] URL: www.usclimatedata.com (accessed November 2014).

Vicens N, Bosch J (2000) Weather-dependent pollinator activity in an apple orchard, with special reference to Osmia cornuta and Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae and Apidae). Environmental Entomology 29:413-420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-29.3.413

Vila M, Weiner J (2004) Are invasive plant species better competitors than native plant species? – Evidence from pair-wise experiments. Oikos 105:229-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12682.x

Wagenius S, Lyon SP (2010) Reproduction of Echinacea angustifolia in fragmented prairie is pollen-limited but not pollinator-limited. Ecology 91:733-742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1375.1

Washington Natural Heritage Program (2012) Washington Department of Natural Resources [online] URL: http://www1.dnr.wa.gov/nhp/refdesk/lists/plantrnk.html (accessed August 2012).

Wilson MV, Hammond PC, Schultz CB (1997) The interdependence of native plants and Fender’s blue butterfly. In: Kaye TN, Liston A, Love RM, Luomo D, Meinke RJ, Wilson MV (eds) Conservation management of native flora and fungi. Native Plant Society of Oregon, Corvallis, pp 83-87.

Winfree R, Bartomeus I, Cariveau DP (2011) Native pollinators in anthropogenic habitats. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 42:1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145042