Experimental pollinator decline affects plant reproduction and is mediated by plant mating system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2013)5Abstract
There is growing concern that current pollinator decline will affect the reproduction of plant species, potentially driving a decline in plant population densities. We experimentally tested whether a reduction in flower visitation caused a reduction in fertilization rate in several species, and whether any reduction in fecundity of species depends on their degree of reproductive dependence on pollinators and their attractiveness for pollinators. We recorded visitation rate, fertilization rate, seed weight, flower size and density of nineteen insect-pollinated perennial herbs inside thirty 2 x 2 m dome-shaped cages covered with fishnet (experimental plots) and in thirty control plots in a Norwegian hay meadow. We used a bagging experiment to estimate the ability of the study species to produce seeds in the absence of pollinators. The visitation rate for fifteen of nineteen study species was lower inside cages than outside and only three of the fifteen species showed significantly reduced fertilization rates in the experimental plots. The magnitude of reduction in fertilization rate was positively related to the degree of pollinator dependence, but not to their attractiveness for pollinators or to the reduction in visitation rate. Seed weight was not affected by the experiment. The lack of an overall effect of reduced pollinator visitation on fertilization rate suggests that some species may be robust to a pollinator decline that could increase pollen limitation on plant reproduction. Our results suggest that species with greater pollinator dependence are more vulnerable to pollinator loss.
References
Aguilar R, Ashworth L, Galetto L, Aizen MA (2006) Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecology Letters 9:968-980 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00927.x
Aizen MA, Harder LD (2007) Expanding the limits of the pollen-limitation concept: effects of pollen quantity and quality. Ecology 88:271-281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1017
Allen-Wardell G et al. (1998) The potential consequences of pollinator declines on the conservation of biodiversity and stability of food crop yields. Conservation Biology 12:8-17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.97154.x
Alley T (1982) Competition theory, evolution, and the concept of an ecological niche. Acta Biotheoretica 31:165-179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01857239
Andersson S (2008) Pollinator and nonpollinator selection on ray morphology in Leucanthemum vulgare (oxeye daisy, Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 95:1072-1078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800087
Ashman T-L et al. (2004) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85:2408-2421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/03-8024
Baker K, Richards AJ, Tremayne M (1994) Fitness constraints on flower number, seed number and seed size in the dimorphic species Primula farinosa L. and Armeria maritima (Miller) Willd. New Phytologist 128:563-570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb03002.x
Bell G (1985) On the function of flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 224:223-266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1985.0031
Biesmeijer JC et al. (2006) Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313:351-354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127863
Burd M (1994) Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Botanical Review 60:83-139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02856594
Culley TM, Weller SG, Sakai AK (2002) The evolution of wind pollination in angiosperms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:361-369 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02540-5
Dauber J et al. (2010) Effects of patch size and density on flower visitation and seed set of wild plants: a pan-European approach. Journal of Ecology 98:188-196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01590.x
Dobeš C, Lückl A, Hülber K, Paule J (2013) Prospects and limits of the flow cytometric seed screen – insights from Potentilla sensu lato (Potentilleae, Rosaceae). New Phytologist 198:605-616 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12149
Dreisig H (1995) Ideal free distributions of nectar foraging bumblebees. Oikos 72:161-172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3546218
Dudash MR, Fenster CB (2000) Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in fragmented populations. In: A. Y, G. C (eds) Genetics, demography and viability of fragmented populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp 35-53 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623448.005
Dudash MR, Hassler C, Stevens PM, Fenster CB (2011) Experimental floral and inflorescence trait manipulations affect pollinator preferences and function in a hummingbird-pollinated plant. American Journal of Botany 98:275-282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000350
Dukas R, Real LA (1993) Effects of recent experience on foraging decisions by bumble bees. Oecologia 94:244-246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00341323
Ebeling A, Klein AM, Schumacher J, Weisser WW, Tscharntke T (2008) How does plant richness affect pollinator richness and temporal stability of flower visits? Oikos 117:1808-1815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16819.x
Eckert CG et al. (2009) Plant mating systems in a changing world. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25:35-43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.013
Eckhart V (1991) The effects of floral display on pollinator visitation vary among populations of Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Evolutionary Ecology 5:370-384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214154
Fischer M, Matthies D (1998) Effects of population size on performance in the rare plant Gentianella germanica. Journal of Ecology 86:195-204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00246.x
Fontaine C, Collin CL, Dajoz I (2008) Generalist foraging of pollinators: diet expansion at high density. Journal of Ecology 96:1002-1010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01405.x
Fontaine C, Dajoz I, Meriguet J, Loreau M (2006) Functional diversity of plant–pollinator interaction webs enhances the persistence of plant communities PLoS Biol, vol. 4, P e1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040001
Franzen M, Larsson M (2009) Seed set differs in relation to pollen and nectar foraging flower visitors in an insect-pollinated herb. Nordic Journal of Botany 27:274-283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.2009.00348.x
Galen C, Newport MEA (1987) Bumble bee behavior and selection on flower size in the sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia 74:20-23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377340
Gomez JM, Abdelaziz M, Lorite J, Munoz-Pajares AJ, Perfectti F (2010) Changes in pollinator fauna cause spatial variation in pollen limitation. Journal of Ecology 98:1243-1252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01691.x
Goulson D (2003) Bumblebees - their behaviour and ecology. Oxford University Press
Goulson D, Lye GC, Darvill B (2008) Decline and conservation of bumble bees. Annual Review of Entomology 53:191-208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093454
Grindeland JM (2008) Inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression in Digitalis purpurea: optimal outcrossing distance in a tetraploid. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21:716-726 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01519.x
Grindeland JM, Sletvold N, Ims RA (2005) Effects of floral display size and plant density on pollinator visitation rate in a natural population of Digitalis purpurea. Functional Ecology 19:383-390 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.00988.x
Hardy OJ, De Loose M, Vekemans X, Meerts P (2001) Allozyme segregation and inter-cytotype reproductive barriers in the polyploid complex Centaurea jacea. Heredity 87:136-145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00862.x
Hegland SJ, Boeke L (2006) Relationships between the density and diversity of floral resources and flower visitor activity in a temperate grassland community. Ecological Entomology 31:532-538 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00812.x
Hegland SJ, Nielsen A, Lázaro A, Bjerknes AL, Totland O (2009) How does climate warming affect plant-pollinator interactions? Ecology Letters 12:184-195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01269.x
Hegland SJ, Totland O (2005) Relationships between species' floral traits and pollinator visitation in a temperate grassland. Oecologia 145:586-594 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0165-6
Hensen I, Wesche K (2006) Relationships between population size, genetic diversity and fitness components in the rare plant Dictamnus albus in Central Germany. Biodiversity and Conservation 15:2249-2261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-7183-2
Houliston GJ, Chapman HM (2004) Reproductive strategy and population variability in the facultative apomict Hieracium pilosella (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 91:37-44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.1.37
Husband BC, Schemske DW (1996) Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54-70 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb04472.x
Inouye DW (1978) Resource partitioning in bumblebees: experimental studies of foraging behavior. Ecology 59:672-678 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1938769
Jennersten O (1988) Pollination in Dianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae): effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed set. Conservation Biology 2:359-366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1988.tb00200.x
Jennersten O, Nilsson SG (1993) Insect flower visitation frequency and seed production in relation to patch size of Viscaria vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae). Oikos 68:283-292 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3544841
Kalisz S, Vogler DW (2003) Benefits of autonomous selfing under unpredictable pollinator environments. Ecology 84:2928-2942 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0519
Karron JD, Thumser NN, Tucker R, Hessenauer AJ (1995) The influence of population density on outcrossing rates in Mimulus ringens. Heredity 75:175-180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1995.121
Kearns CA, Inouye DW, Waser NM (1998) Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:83-112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.83
Kennedy BF, Elle E (2008) The reproductive assurance benefit of selfing: importance of flower size and population size. Oecologia 155:469-477 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0924-7
Knight TM et al. (2005) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36:467-497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102403.115320
Koltunow AM, Johnson SD, Bicknell RA (1998) Sexual and apomictic development in Hieracium. Sexual Plant Reproduction 11:213-230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004970050144
Krahulec F, Krahulcová A, Fehrer J, Brautigam S, Schuhwerk F (2008) The structure of the agamic complex of Hieracium subgen. Pilosella in the Sumava Mts and its comparison with other regions in Central Europe. PRESILA-PRAHA- 80:1
Kunin WE (1997) Population size and density effects in pollination: pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber. Journal of Ecology 85:225-234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2960653
Lázaro A, Aase ALTO, Totland O (2011) Relationships between densities of previous and simultaneous foragers and the foraging behaviour of three bumblebee species. Ecological Entomology 36:221-230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2011.01263.x
Lázaro A, Jakobsson A, Totland O (2013) How do pollinator visitation rate and seed set relate to species’ floral traits and community context? Oecologia DOI 10.1007/s00442-013-2652-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2652-5
Lázaro A, Lundgren R, Totland O (Submitted) Experimental reduction of pollinator visitation modifies plant-plant interactions for pollination.
Leduc N, Douglas GC, Monnier M, Connolly V (1990) Pollination in vitro: effects on the growth of pollen tubes, seed set and gametophytic self-incompatibility in Trifolium pratense L. and T. repens L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 80:657-664 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224226
Lienert J, Fischer M (2004) Experimental inbreeding reduces seed production and germination independent of fragmentation of populations of Swertia perennis. Basic and Applied Ecology 5:43-52 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1078/1439-1791-00212
Moeller DA, Geber MA, Eckhart VM, Tiffin P (2012) Reduced pollinator service and elevated pollen limitation at the geographic range limit of an annual plant. Ecology 93:1036-1048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1462.1
Norderhaug A (1995) Mating systems of three meadow plant species. Nordic Journal of Botany 15:243-250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1995.tb00149.x
Nosrati H, Price AH, Wilcock CC (2010) No evidence of apomixis in matroclinal progeny from experimental crosses in the genus Fragaria (strawberry) based on RAPDs. Euphytica 171:193-202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-0008-3
Noyes RD (2007) Apomixis in the Asteraceae: diamonds in the rough. Functional Plant Science and Biotechnology 1:207-222
Olesen JM, Forfang AS, Baez M (1998) Stress-induced male sterility and mixed mating in the island plant Cedronella canariensis (Lamiaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 212:159-176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01089737
Oostermeijer JGB, Luijten SH, Krenova ZV, Den Nijs HCM (1998) Relationships between population and habitat characteristics and reproduction of the rare Gentiana pneumonanthe L. Conservation Biology 12:1042-1053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97090.x
Pauw A (2007) Collapse of a pollination web in small conservation areas. Ecology 88:1759-1769 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1383.1
Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE (2010) Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25:345-353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007
Ramula S, Toivonen E, Mutikainen P (2007) Demographic Consequences of Pollen Limitation and Inbreeding Depression in a Gynodioecious Herb. International Journal of Plant Sciences 168:443-453 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/512040
Rusterholz HP, Baur B (2010) Delayed response in a plant-pollinator system to experimental grassland fragmentation. Oecologia 163:141-152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1567-7
Schulze J, Rufener R, Erhardt A, Stoll P (2012) The relative importance of sexual and clonal reproduction for population growth in the perennial herb Fragaria vesca. Population Ecology 54:369-380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-012-0321-x
Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (1999) Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set. Oecologia 121:432-440 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050949
Stephen D, Krebs J (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press
Thomson JD, Maddison WP, Plowright RC (1982) Behavior of bumble bee pollinators of Aralia hispida Vent. (Araliaceae). Oecologia 54:326-336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380001
Totland O, Sottocornola M (2001) Pollen limitation of reproductive success in two sympatric alpine willows (Salicaceae) with contrasting pollination strategies. American Journal of Botany 88:1011-1015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2657082
Valido A, Dupont YL, Hansen DM (2002) Native birds and insects, and introduced honey bees visiting Echium wildpretii (Boraginaceae) in the Canary Islands. Acta Oecologica 23:413-419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1146-609X(02)01167-0
Vange V (2002) Breeding system and inbreeding depression in the clonal plant species Knautia arvensis (Dipsacaceae): implications for survival in abandoned grassland. Biological Conservation 108:59-67 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00090-3
Waser NM, Price MV (1994) Crossing-distance effects in Delphinium nelsonii: outbreeding and inbreeding depression in progeny fitness. Evolution 48:842-852 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01366.x
Wedderburn F, Richards AJ (1990) Variation in within-morph incompatibility inhibition sites in heteromorphic Primula L. New Phytologist 116:149-162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00520.x
Wilcock C, Neiland R (2002) Pollination failure in plants: why it happens and when it matters. Trends in Plant Science 7:270-277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02258-6
Wissman J (2006) Reproduction and population structure of Primula veris L. Primulaceae) in semi-natural grasslands – a landscape and management perspective. Dept. of Conservation Biology. SLU
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Rebekka Lundgren, Amparo Lazáro, Ørjan Totland

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



