Reproductive biology of pointleaf manzanita (Arctostaphylos pungens) and the pollinator-nectar robber spectrum

Authors

  • Leif Richardson Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Dartmouth College Hanover New Hampshire
  • Judith L. Bronstein

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2012)13

Abstract

Floral visitor species are often assumed to act either mutualistically towards plants (as pollinators) or to exploit them (as nectar-robbers or as nectar or pollen thieves). We investigated the reproductive biology of pointleaf manzanita (Arctostaphylos pungens K. Kunth), a regionally abundant North American shrub, in relation to the wide spectrum of behaviours displayed by its flower-visiting insects. We recorded A. pungens population-level flowering phenology and nectar standing crop, and conducted experiments documenting its breeding system, in an Arizona upland habitat in 1998 and 1999. Floral visitors were observed over 38 hr. We recorded frequencies of six foraging behaviours within and among individuals of each visitor species.

Arctostaphylos pungens flowers in late winter. During this period it is the only abundant floral resource for a diverse array of generalist insects in its habitat. We observed 1206 floral visits by 46 taxa. Most floral visitors pursued mixed behaviours: at the species and/or individual level, they foraged both legitimately and as nectar-robbers or thieves. The most commonly mixed behaviours were legitimate pollen collection (which likely resulted in pollen transfer) and secondary nectar-robbing (which was highly unlikely to do so). As A. pungens was found to be largely self-incompatible, robbing and thieving visits should be detrimental to reproductive success.

Although theoretical analyses often assume that exploiters must be punished or excluded for mutualism to persist evolutionarily, exploitation is in fact ubiquitous within cooperative interactions in nature. In manzanita, very few floral visitor species could be classified as exclusively beneficial or detrimental to plants: rather, they exhibited multiple foraging strategies, with no evidence of plant control. Such pollinator-nectar robber spectra appear to be common, and constitute an important challenge to current understanding of how mutualism can persist.

NOTE: Supporting information to this article may be found in the left menu.

Author Biography

Leif Richardson, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Dartmouth College Hanover New Hampshire

Graduate student, Biology Department, Dartmouth College

References

Agrawal AA, Rudgers JA, Botsford LW, Cutler D, Gorin, JB Lundquist CJ, Spitzer BW, Swann AL (2000) Benefits and constraints on plant defense against herbivores: spines influence the legitimate and illegitimate flower visitors of yellow star thistle, Centaurea solstitialis L. (Asteraceae). Southwestern Naturalist 45: 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3672545

Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211: 1390-1396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7466396

Barrows EM (1980) Robbing of exotic plants by introduced carpenter and honey bees in Hawaii, with comparative notes. Biotropica 12: 23-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2387770

Bené, F (1945) The role of learning in the feeding behavior of black-chinned hummingbirds. The Condor 47(1): 3-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1364444

Borror DJ, Triplehorn CA, Johnson NF (1989) An Introduction to the Study of Insects. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia.

Bronstein JL (2001) The exploitation of mutualisms. Ecology Letters 4: 277-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00218.x

Bronstein JL (2003) The scope for exploitation within mutualistic interactions. In: Hammerstein P (ed) Genetics and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 185-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3232.003.0012

Brown DE (1982) Biotic communities of the American Southwest - United States and Mexico. Desert Plants 4: 1-342.

Bull JJ, Rice WR (1991) Distinguishing mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 149: 63-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80072-4

Dedej S, Delaplane KS (2005) Net energetic advantage drives honey bees (Apis mellifera L) to nectar larceny in Vaccinium ashei Reade. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 57: 398-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0852-z

Diggs GM, Jr (2009) Arctostaphylos. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee, (eds) Flora of North America North of Mexico, volume 3. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford, pp 356-357.

Free JB (1968) The behaviour of bees visiting runner beans (Phaseolus multiflorus). Journal of Applied Ecology 5: 631-638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2401637

Free JB (1993) Insect pollination of crops. Academic Press, London.

Hargreaves, AL, Harder LD, Johnson SD (2009) Consumptive emasculation: the ecological and evolutionary consequences of pollen theft. Biological Reviews 84(2): 259-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00074.x

Hargreaves, AL, Harder LD, Johnson SD (2012) Native pollen thieves reduce the reproductive success of a hermaphroditic plant, Aloe maculata. Ecology 91(6): 1693-1703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0792.1

Hawkins RP (1961) Observations on the pollination of red clover by bees. I. The yield of seed in relation to the numbers and kinds of pollinators. Annals of Applied Biology 49: 55-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1961.tb03592.x

Herrera CM (1987) Components of pollinator "quality": comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. Oikos 50: 79-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3565403

Higashi S, Ohara M, Arai, H, Matsuo K (1988) Robber-like pollinators: overwintered queen bumblebees foraging on Corydalis ambigua. Ecological Entomology 13: 411-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1988.tb00373.x

Howe HF (1984) Constraints of the evolution of mutualism. American Naturalist 123: 764-777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/284238

Hurd PD Jr, Linsley EG (1963) Pollination of the unicorn plant (Martyniaceae) by an oligolectic, corolla-cutting bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 36: 248-252.

Inouye DW (1980) The terminology of floral larceny. Ecology 61: 1251-1253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1936841

Irwin RE (2000) Hummingbird avoidance of nectar-robbed plants: spatial location or visual cues. Oikos 91: 499-506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910311.x

Irwin RE (2003) Impact of nectar robbing on estimates of pollen flow: conceptual predictions and empirical outcomes. Ecology 84: 485-495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0485:IONROE]2.0.CO;2

Irwin RE, Brody AK (1999) Nectar-robbing bumble bees reduce the fitness of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). Ecology 80: 1703-1712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1703:NRBBRT]2.0.CO;2

Irwin RE, Brody AK (2000) Consequences of nectar robbing for realized male function in a hummingbird-pollinated plant. Ecology 81: 2637-2643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2637:CONRFR]2.0.CO;2

Irwin RE, Brody AK, Waser NM (2001) The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations, and communities. Oecologia 129: 161-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100739

Irwin RE, Bronstein JL, Manson JS, Richardson L (2010) Nectar-robbing: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 41: 271-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120330

Joubert G, Tasei JN, Delaude A (1977) Pollinisation du trèfle violet diploide (Trifolium pratense L.) par les apoides et particulièrement par les abeilles domestiques hybride (Apis mellifica causasica x A. mellifica ligustica). Apidologie 8: 259-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:19770304

Kearney T, Peebles RH (1960) Arizona flora. University of California Press, Berkeley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520324244

Kwak M (1977) Pollination ecology of five hemiparasitic, large-flowered Rhinanthoideae with special reference to the pollination behaviour of nectar thieving, short-tongued bumblebees. Acta Botanica Neerlandica, 26: 97-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1977.tb01103.x

Maloof JE (2001) The effects of a bumble bee nectar robber on plant reproductive success and pollinator behavior. American Journal of Botany 88: 1960-1965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3558423

McAlpine JF (ed) 1981-1989. Manual of nearctic Diptera. Ottawa: Research Branch, Agriculture Canada.

Michener CD, McGinley RJ, Danforth BN (1994) The bee genera of North and Central America (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.

Morris WF (1996) Mutualism denied? Nectar-robbing bumble bees do not reduce female or male success of bluebells. Ecology 77: 1451-1462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2265542

Navarro L (2000) Pollination ecology of Anthyllis vulneraria subsp. vulgaris (Fabaceae): Nectar robbers as pollinators. American Journal of Botany 87: 980-985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2656997

Newman DA, Thomson JD (2005) Effects of nectar robbing on nectar dynamics and bumblebee foraging strategies in Linaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae). Oikos 110: 309-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13884.x

Olesen JM (1996) From naiveté to experience: Bumblebee queens (Bombus terrestris) foraging on Corydalis cava (Fumariaceae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 69: 274-286.

Prys-Jones OE, Willmer PG (1992) The biology of alkaline nectar in the purple toothwort (Lathraea clandestina): ground level defenses. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 45: 373-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1992.tb00650.x

Richardson L (1999) Mutualist and antagonist flower visitors: a pollination study of two species of manzanita (Arctostaphylos: Ericaceae). Masters Thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson.

Richardson SC (2004) Are nectar-robbers mutualists or antagonists? Oecologia 139: 246-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1504-8

Rust RW (1979) Pollination of Impatiens capensis: pollinators and nectar robbers. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 52: 297-308.

Schemske DW, Horvitz CC (1984) Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: a precondition for mutualism specialization. Science 225: 519-521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.225.4661.519

Scott PE, Buchmann SL, O'Rourke MK (1993) Evidence for mutualism between a flower-piercing carpenter bee (Xylocopa californica) and ocotillo (Fouquieria splendens): use of pollen and nectar by nesting bees. Ecological Entomology 18: 234-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1993.tb01095.x

Villalobos EM, Shelly TE (1996) Temporal and spatial variation in the foraging behavior of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) at Chinese violets. Florida Entomologist 79: 398-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3495589

Waser NM, Chittka L, Price MV, Williams NM, Ollerton J (1996) Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77: 1043-1060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2265575

Weaver N (1956) The foraging behaviour of honeybees on hairy vetch. I. Foraging methods and learning to forage. Insectes Sociaux 3: 537-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02226457

Western Regional Climate Center (2012) Sabino Canyon, Arizona. www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?azsabi

Yu DW (2001) Parasites of mutualisms. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 72: 529-546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2001.tb01336.x

Published

2012-11-04

How to Cite

Richardson, L., & Bronstein, J. L. (2012). Reproductive biology of pointleaf manzanita (Arctostaphylos pungens) and the pollinator-nectar robber spectrum. Journal of Pollination Ecology, 9, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2012)13

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)