Innate or learned preference for upward-facing flowers?: implications for the costs of pendent flowers from experiments on captive bumble bees
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2012)11Abstract
Pollinator preferences for phenotypic characters, including floral orientation, can affect plant reproductive success. For example, hawkmoths and syrphid flies prefer upward- over downward-facing flowers in field experiments. Although such preferences suggest a cost of pendent flowers in terms of pollinator attraction, we cannot rule out the possibility that the preferences have been affected by prior experience: pollinators might choose the same type of flowers to which they have already become accustomed. To test for innate preference, we observed bumble bees foraging on an array of upward- and downward-facing artificial flowers. Without any prior experience with vertical flowers, 91.7% bees chose an upward-facing flower at the very first visit. In addition to this innate preference, we also found that the preference was strengthened by experience, which suggests that the bees learned upward-facing flowers were easier to handle. Although bumble bees may concentrate on pendent flowers in the field, such learned preferences are evidently imposed on a template of upward-facing preference. Because bee-pollinated pendent flowers face particular difficulties in attracting visits, therefore, we expect them to compensate through other means, such as greater floral rewards.
References
Best LS, Bierzychudek P (1982) Pollinator foraging on foxglove (Digitalis purpurea): a test of a new model. Evolution 36:70-79.
Burns JG, Thomson JD (2006) A test of spatial memory and movement patterns of bumblebees at multiple spatial and temporal scales. Behavioral Ecology 17:48-55.
Cartar RV (2004) Resource tracking by bumble bees: response to plant-level differences in quality. Ecology 85:2764-2771.
Castellanos MC, Wilson P, Thomson JD (2004) 'Anti-bee' and 'pro-bird' changes during the evolution of hummingbird pollination in Penstemon flowers. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17:876-885.
Cnaani J, Thomson JD, Papaj DR (2006) Flower choice and learning in foraging bumblebees: effects of variation in nectar volume and concentration. Ethology 112:278-285.
Conner JK, Rush S (1996) Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 105:509-516.
Engel EC, Irwin RE (2003) Linking pollinator visitation rate and pollen receipt. American Journal of Botany 90:1612-1618.
Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Dudash MR (2009) Specialization of flowers: is floral orientation an overlooked first step? New Phytologist 183:502-506.
Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD (2004) Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 35:375-403.
Fulton M, Hodges SA (1999) Floral isolation between Aquilegia formosa and Aquilegia pubescens. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 266:2247-2252.
Galen C, Newport MEA (1987) Bumble bee behavior and selection on flower size in the sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia 74:20-23.
Galen C, Stanton ML (1989) Bumble bee pollination and floral morphology: factors influencing pollen dispersal in the alpine sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 76:419-426.
Gumbert A (2000) Color choices by bumble bees (Bombus terrestris): Innate preferences and generalization after learning. Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology 48:36-43.
Harder LD, Jordan CY, Gross WE, Routley MB (2004) Beyond floricentrism: The pollination function of inflorescences. Plant Species Biology 19:137-148.
Heinrich B (1976) The foraging specializations of individual bumblebees. Ecological Monographs 46:105-128.
Heinrich B (1979) "Majoring" and "Minoring" by foraging bumblebees, Bombus vagans: an experimental analysis. Ecology 60:245-255.
Henderson J, Hurly TA, Bateson M, Healy SD (2006) Timing in free-living rufous hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus. Current Biology 16:512-515.
Huang S-Q, Takahashi Y, Dafni A (2002) Why does the flower stalk of Pulsatilla cernua (Raunculaceae) bend during anthesis? American Journal of Botany 89:1599 –1603.
Ishii HS (2005) Analysis of bumblebee visitation sequences within single bouts: implication of the overstrike effect on short-term memory. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 57:599-610.
Johnson SG, Delph LF, Elderkin CL (1995) The effect of petal-size manipulation on pollen removal, seed set, and insect-visitor behavior in Campanula americana. Oecologia 102:174-179.
Jones KN, Reithel JS (2001) Pollinator-mediated selection on a flower color polymorphism in experimental populations of Antirrhinum (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 88:447-454.
Kelber A (1997) Innate preferences for flower features in the hawkmoth Macroglossum stellatarum. Journal of Experimental Biology 200:827-836.
Kobayashi S, Inoue K, Kato M (1997) Evidence of pollen transfer efficiency as the natural selection factor favoring a large corolla of Campanula punctata pollinated by Bombus diversus. Oecologia 111:535-542.
Laverty TM (1994) Bumble bee learning and flower morphology. Animal Behaviour 47:531-545.
Laverty TM, Plowright RC (1988) Flower handling by bumblebees a comparison of specialists and generalists. Animal Behaviour 36:733-740.
Lunau K, Maier EJ (1995) Innate color preferences of flower visitors. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 177:1-19.
Mahoro S (2003) Effects of flower and seed predators and pollinators on fruit production in two sequentially flowering congeners. Plant Ecology 166:37-48.
Makino TT, Sakai S (2007) Experience changes pollinator responses to floral display size: from size-based to reward-based foraging. Functional Ecology 21:854-863.
Makino TT (2008) Bumble bee preference for flowers arranged on a horizontal plane versus inclined planes. Functional Ecology 22:1027-1032.
Morinaga SI, Sakai S (2006) Functional differentiation in pollination processes between the outer and inner perianths in Iris gracilipes (Iridaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 84:164-171.
Ohashi K, Thomson JD (2009) Trapline foraging by pollinators: its ontogeny, economics and possible consequences for plants. Annals of Botany 103:1365-1378.
Percival M, Morgan P (1965) Observations of the floral biology of Digitalis species. New Phytologist 61:1-22.
Percival MS, Morgan P, Lewis DE (1968) Behaviour of Bombus on Digitalis spp. New Phytologist 67:759-769.
Pleasants JM (1981) Bumblebee response to variation in nectar availability. Ecology 62:1648-1661.
Schemske DW, Bradshaw H D, Jr. (1999) Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96:11910-11915.
Stubbs CS, Drummond FA (2001) Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae): an alternative to Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) for lowbush blueberry pollination. Journal of Economic Entomology 94:609-616.
Tadey M, Aizen MA (2001) Why do flowers of a hummingbird-pollinated mistletoe face down? Functional Ecology 15:782–790.
Thomson JD (1988) Effects of variation in inflorescence size and floral rewards on the visitation rates of traplining pollinators of Aralia hispida. Evolutionary Ecology 2:65-76.
Thomson JD (2003) When is it mutualism? American Naturalist 162:S1–S9.
Thomson JD, Chittka L (2001) Pollinator individuality: when does it matter? In: Chittka L, Thomson JD (eds) Cognitive Ecology of Pollination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 191-213.
Ushimaru A, Dohzono I, Takami Y, Hyodo F (2009) Flower orientation enhances pollen transfer in bilaterally symmetrical flowers. Oecologia 160:667-674.
Ushimaru A, Hyodo F (2005) Why do bilaterally symmetrical flowers orient vertically? Flower orientation influences pollinator landing behaviour Evolutionary Ecology Research 7:151-160.
Waddington KD, Heinrich B (1979) The foraging movements of bumblebees on vertical “Inflorescences”: an experimental analysis. Journal of comparative physiology A 134:113-117.
Weiss MR (1997) Innate colour preferences and flexible colour learning in the pipevine swallowtail. Animal Behaviour 53:1043-1052.
Whitney HM, Chittka L, Bruce TJA, Glover BJ (2009) Conical epidermal cells allow bees to grip flowers and increase foraging efficiency. Current Biology 19:948-953.
Wilson P, Thomson JD (1991) Heterogeneity among floral visitors leads to discordance between removal and deposition of pollen. Ecology 72:1503-1507.
Worden BD, Skemp AK, Papaj DR (2005) Learning in two contexts: the effects of interference and body size in bumble bees. Journal of Experimental Biology 208:2045-2053.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Takashi T Makino, James D Thomson

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



