From birds to bees: applying video observation techniques to invertebrate pollinators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2011)20Abstract
Observation is a critical element of behavioural ecology and ethology. Here, we propose a similar set of techniques to enhance the study of the diversity patterns of invertebrate pollinators and associated plant species. In a body of avian research, cameras are set up on nests in blinds to examine chick and parent interactions. This avoids observer bias, minimizes interference, and provides numerous other benefits including timestamps, the capacity to record frequency and duration of activities, and provides a permanent archive of activity for later analyses. Hence, we propose that small video cameras in blinds can also be used to continuously monitor pollinator activity on plants thereby capitalizing on those same benefits. This method was proofed in 2010 in the alpine in BC, Canada on target focal plant species and on open mixed assemblages of plant species. Apple ipod nanos successfully recorded activity for an entire day at a time totalling 450 hours and provided sufficient resolution and field of view to both identify pollinators to recognizable taxonomic units and monitor movement and visitation rates at a scale of view of approximately 50 cm2. This method is not a replacement for pan traps or sweep nets but an opportunity to enhance these datasets with more detailed, finer-resolution data. Importantly, the test of this specific method also indicates that far more hours of observation - using any method - are likely required than most current ecological studies published to accurately estimate pollinator diversity.
References
Biesmeijer JC et al. (2006) Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313:351–354
Brechbuhla R, Kropfc C, Bachera S (2010) Impact of flower-dwelling crab spiders on plant-pollinator mutualisms. Basic and Applied Ecology 11:76-82
Budden AE, Wright J (2008) Effects of feeding frequency on nestling begging and digestion. Ibis 150:234-241
Colwell RK (2010) EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8
Dicks LV, Corbet SA, Pywell RF (2002) Compartmentalization in plant–insect flower visitor webs. Journal of Animal Ecology 71:32-43
Dupont YL, Hansen DM, Olensen JM (2003) Structure of a plant–pollinator network in the high altitude sub-alpine desert of Tenerife, Canary Islands. Ecography 26:301–310
Godfray HCJ (1995) Signalling of need between parents and young: parent-offspring conflict and sibling rivalry. American Naturalist 146:1-24
Gottlander K (1987) Parental feeding behaviour and sibling competition in the pied flycatcher Fidecula hypoleuca. Ornis Scandinavica 18:269-276
Hegland SJ, Totland O (2005) Relationships between species’ floral traits and pollinator visitation in a temperate grassland. Oecologia 145 586-594
Jennions MD, Møller AP (2003) A survey of the statistical power of research in behavioral ecology and animal behavior. Behavioral Ecology 14 438–445
Kaiser-Bunbury CN, Muff S, Memmott J, Müller CB, Caflisch A (2010) The robustness of pollination networks to the loss of species and interactions a quantitative approch incorporating pollinator behaviour. Ecology Letters 13:442-452
Kolliker M, Richner H, Werner I, Heeb P (1988) Begging signals and biparental care: nestling choice between parental feeding locations. Animal Behaviour 55:215-222
Krebs EA (2002) Sibling competition and parental control: Pattern of begging in parrots. In: Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
Ladd PG, Arroyo MT (2009) Comparisons of breeding systems between two sympatric species, Nastanthus spathulatus (Calyceraceae) and Rhodophiala rhodolirion (Amaryllidaceae), in the high Andes of central Chile. Plant Species Biology 24:2-10
Manetas Y, Petropoulou Y (2000) Nectar Amount, Pollinator Visit Duration and Pollination Success in the Mediterranean Shrub Cistus creticus. Annals of Botany 86:815-820
Marten-Rodrıguez S, Fenster CB (2008) Pollination ecology and breeding systems of five Gesneria species from Puerto Rico. Annals of Botany 102:23–30
Mayo E (1949) Hawthorne and the Western Electric Company. The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilisation. Routledge
Olesen JM, Jordano P (2002) Geographic patterns in plant–pollinator mutualistic networks. Ecology 83:2416-2424
Steen R, Thorsdatter Orvedal Aase AL (2011) Portable digital video surveillance system for monitoring flower-visiting bumblebees. Journal of Pollination Ecology 5:90-94
Whitaker DL, Webster LA, Edwards J (2007) The biomechanics of Cornus canadensis stamens are ideal for catapulting pollen vertically. Functional Ecology 21:219-225
Williams NM, Minckley RL, F.A. S ( 2001) Variation in native bee faunas and its implications for detecting community changes. Conservation Ecology 5:7
Wilson JS, Wilson LE, Loftis LD, Griswold T (2010) The montane bee fauna of north central washington, usa, with floral associations. Western North American Naturalist 70:198–207
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 C J Lortie, Amber Budden, Anya Reid

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



